1992 Mercury Tracer vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Tracer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Tracer (127 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Tracer should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 5 kg more than 1992 Mercury Tracer.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mercury Tracer (154 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (127 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1992 Mercury Tracer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mercury Tracer | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Mercury | Volkswagen |
| Model | Tracer | Polo |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1839 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 154 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1109 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2470 mm |
