1992 Mercury Villager vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1992 Mercury Villager is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Villager (149 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 790 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mercury Villager | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Mercury | Volvo |
| Model | Villager | 120 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2960 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |
