1992 Mercury Villager vs. 2000 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2000 Nissan Almera is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Almera. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Almera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 320 kg more than 2000 Nissan Almera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mercury Villager | 2000 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Villager | Almera |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2540 mm |