1992 MG RV8 vs. 2008 Rover 25
To start off, 2008 Rover 25 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 MG RV8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 MG RV8 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 MG RV8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 MG RV8 (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2008 Rover 25. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 MG RV8 should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 25.
Because 1992 MG RV8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 MG RV8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 MG RV8 | 2008 Rover 25 | |
Make | MG | Rover |
Model | RV8 | 25 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |