1992 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Magna | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Magna | Rogue |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2554 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2690 mm |