1992 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 116 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Magna | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Magna | C30 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2554 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 101 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2639 mm |
