1992 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. (30 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1992 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Renault Clio (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. (43 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Minica | 2011 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Minica | Clio |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 548 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 43 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2480 mm |
