1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 460 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Sigma | 120 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |
