1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser. (123 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 340 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser (295 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Sigma | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |