1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2001 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2001 Honda CR-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2001 Honda CR-V. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Honda CR-V weights approximately 30 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2001 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Honda |
Model | Sigma | CR-V |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |