1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2001 Spyker C8
To start off, 2001 Spyker C8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Spyker C8 (395 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Spyker C8 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 320 kg more than 2001 Spyker C8.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Spyker C8 (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Spyker C8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2001 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Spyker |
| Model | Sigma | C8 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 395 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 481 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2580 mm |
