1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2003 Volvo S40. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 19 kg more than 2003 Volvo S40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo S40. (166 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Sigma | S40 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2670 mm |
