1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2011 Audi A1
To start off, 2011 Audi A1 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2011 Audi A1. (104 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi A1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 430 kg more than 2011 Audi A1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Audi A1. (250 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Audi A1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2011 Audi A1 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
| Model | Sigma | A1 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3954 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1416 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2469 mm |
