1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2011 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2011 Hyundai i20 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2011 Hyundai i20. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2011 Hyundai i20.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Hyundai i20. (137 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Hyundai i20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2011 Hyundai i20 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Hyundai |
| Model | Sigma | i20 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2525 mm |
