1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2011 Kia Forte
To start off, 2011 Kia Forte is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2011 Kia Forte. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Forte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 232 kg more than 2011 Kia Forte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Kia Forte. (195 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Kia Forte.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2011 Kia Forte | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Kia |
Model | Sigma | Forte |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1238 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2649 mm |