1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2011 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2011 Pagani Zonda is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2011 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Pagani Zonda (547 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 240 kg more than 2011 Pagani Zonda.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Pagani Zonda (759 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 508 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2011 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Pagani |
| Model | Sigma | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 547 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 759 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1141 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2730 mm |
