1992 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2012 Kia Optima
To start off, 2012 Kia Optima is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2012 Kia Optima. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2012 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Optima weights approximately 113 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Kia Optima. (209 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2012 Kia Optima | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Kia |
| Model | Sigma | Optima |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 166 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1583 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4844 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1831 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2797 mm |
