1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 85 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Because 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Studebaker |
Model | Space Runner | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1992 | 1958 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1833 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2980 mm |