1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 1980 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner weights approximately 310 kg more than 1980 Opel Ascona.
Because 1980 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 1980 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Opel |
Model | Space Runner | Ascona |
Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2530 mm |