1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 60 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Space Runner | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1992 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2680 mm |