1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2002 Suzuki F1

To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.

Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner (164 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner has manual transmission. 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: