1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (164 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | Space Runner | 75 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1833 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2750 mm |