1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (132 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura CSX weights approximately 103 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2010 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
| Model | Space Runner | CSX |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |
