1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (164 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
| Model | Space Runner | Epica |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1833 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |
