1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner (81 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Space Runner | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2490 mm |