1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 236 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (164 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Space Runner | C30 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1833 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2639 mm |
