1992 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 2011 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2011 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 2011 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Space Wagon | Mustang |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2720 mm |