1992 Mitsubishi Verada vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Verada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Verada would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Verada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Verada (162 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Verada should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 125 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Verada.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Verada (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Verada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mitsubishi Verada | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Verada | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2649 mm |