1992 Nissan 300 ZX vs. 2009 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan 300 ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan 300 ZX would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Nissan 300 ZX (279 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Nissan 300 ZX should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Nissan 300 ZX (377 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Colorado. (360 Nm). This means 1992 Nissan 300 ZX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Colorado. 2009 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1992 Nissan 300 ZX has manual transmission. 1992 Nissan 300 ZX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: