1992 Nissan Micra vs. 2004 Renault Clio

To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Micra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Micra would be higher. At 1,459 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1992 Nissan Micra. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1992 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 370 kg more than 1992 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Nissan Micra. (73 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Nissan Micra.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Nissan Micra 2004 Renault Clio
Make Nissan Renault
Model Micra Clio
Year Released 1992 2004
Engine Size 988 cc 1459 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 49 HP 81 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 73 Nm 191 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 665 kg 1035 kg
Vehicle Length 3770 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2310 mm 2480 mm