1992 Nissan Pintara vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 1998 Panoz Q9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pintara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pintara would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Panoz Q9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Panoz Q9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Pintara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 510 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Nissan Pintara. (168 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Nissan Pintara. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 1992 Nissan Pintara has manual transmission. 1992 Nissan Pintara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Nissan Pintara | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
| Make | Nissan | Panoz |
| Model | Pintara | Q9 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 1974 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |
