1992 Nissan Pintara vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pintara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pintara would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1992 Nissan Pintara. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1992 Nissan Pintara.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Nissan Pintara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Nissan Pintara. (168 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Nissan Pintara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Nissan Pintara | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Nissan | Citroen |
| Model | Pintara | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1974 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
