1992 Nissan Presea vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Presea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Presea would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Nissan Presea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1992 Nissan Presea. (93 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1992 Nissan Presea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Nissan Presea weights approximately 550 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Presea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Nissan Presea | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Nissan | Westfield |
| Model | Presea | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2320 mm |
