1992 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1992 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Nissan Pulsar | 1991 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Pulsar | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1992 | 1991 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1452 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |