1992 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1996 Renault Megane. (73 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 215 kg more than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Megane. (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Nissan Pulsar | 1996 Renault Megane | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Pulsar | Megane |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2470 mm |