1992 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (200 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1992 Nissan Pulsar. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1992 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1992 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Nissan Pulsar | 1997 Acura TL | |
| Make | Nissan | Acura |
| Model | Pulsar | TL |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2840 mm |
