1992 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 85 kg more than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1992 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Nissan Pulsar | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Pulsar | Clio |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2630 mm |