1992 Oldsmobile Bravada vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada.
Because 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada. (312 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Jaguar |
| Model | Bravada | XF |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2908 mm |
