1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass (138 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 80 kg more than 1986 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Cutlass | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1992 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3030 mm |