1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1991 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass (138 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1991 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Ranger.
Because 1991 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1991 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Cutlass | Ranger |
Year Released | 1992 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4690 mm |