1992 Opel Omega vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,408 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1992 Opel Omega has manual transmission. 1992 Opel Omega will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Opel Omega | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Opel | Volvo |
Model | Omega | S60 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2408 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2720 mm |