1992 Opel Omega vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 1992 Opel Omega has manual transmission. 1992 Opel Omega will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Opel Omega | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Opel | Jeep |
Model | Omega | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2408 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2946 mm |