1992 Opel Omega vs. 2011 Mazda 5
To start off, 2011 Mazda 5 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Opel Omega | 2011 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Opel | Mazda |
Model | Omega | 5 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2408 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4585 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2751 mm |