1992 Peugeot 205 vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Peugeot 205. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Peugeot 205 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1992 Peugeot 205. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Peugeot 205. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1992 Peugeot 205. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Peugeot 205. (115 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Peugeot 205. 2012 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1992 Peugeot 205 has manual transmission. 1992 Peugeot 205 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: