1992 Plymouth Colt vs. 2004 Scion xB
To start off, 2004 Scion xB is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (111 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Scion xB. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2004 Scion xB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 115 kg more than 2004 Scion xB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 1992 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Plymouth Colt | 2004 Scion xB | |
Make | Plymouth | Scion |
Model | Colt | xB |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2510 mm |