1992 Plymouth Colt vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (225 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (91 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 520 kg more than 1992 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (325 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Plymouth Colt | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Plymouth | Toyota |
Model | Colt | Camry |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1466 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2730 mm |