1992 Plymouth Colt vs. 2009 Audi TT
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 110 kg more than 1992 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Plymouth Colt | 2009 Audi TT | |
Make | Plymouth | Audi |
Model | Colt | TT |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2470 mm |