1992 Plymouth Colt vs. 2009 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2009 Renault Symbol is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,466 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (91 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2009 Renault Symbol. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Symbol.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Symbol (160 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2009 Renault Symbol will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Plymouth Colt | 2009 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Plymouth | Renault |
| Model | Colt | Symbol |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1466 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2473 mm |
