1992 Plymouth Colt vs. 2010 Citroen C4
To start off, 2010 Citroen C4 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C4. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C4 weights approximately 31 kg more than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C4. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1992 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Plymouth Colt | 2010 Citroen C4 | |
Make | Plymouth | Citroen |
Model | Colt | C4 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1256 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2610 mm |