1992 Plymouth Colt vs. 2010 Ford F-350
To start off, 2010 Ford F-350 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-350 (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (91 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 34 kg more than 2010 Ford F-350.
Because 2010 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Plymouth Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-350 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Plymouth Colt | 2010 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Plymouth | Ford |
Model | Colt | F-350 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1466 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 3610 mm |